Sindoor Field
Share this painting
Copy the text below to send via message, email, or WhatsApp.
There is a drawer in this studio. A flat file, the kind meant for paper. Canvases go in there when they have stopped speaking and I cannot yet throw them away.
This one went in during 2024.
It was six feet square and black and white by then, though that is not how it started. The texture came first — laid in with a notched trowel, the tool tilers use to comb thinset before they set a tile — and it went everywhere, deep and flowing, snaking across the whole surface. There was colour under that. A lot of colour, I think. I am not certain, which tells you what you need to know about how carefully I was keeping records in those years.
Then 2024 arrived and I was completely obsessed with black and white, and I converted it. Whatever it had been, it stopped being that.
Then the obsession left, the way they do, and the canvas went in the drawer.
Last week I pulled it out.
What I have been obsessed with lately is the opposite of 2024. Colour, and specifically the field — no centre of mass, no form sitting inside a background, the whole canvas one form. That is harder than it sounds. Take the anchor away and the eye has nothing to hold, and most paintings collapse into decoration at exactly that point. What holds this one is the texture, and the texture is two years old and belongs to a painting I cannot fully describe.
I used oil. It moves differently from acrylic — heavier, slower, less willing. Acrylic sits down where you put it. Oil pools. It gathers in the low places between the trowel ridges and thins across the high ones, so a single red laid over that surface stops being a single red. It becomes light and dark of the same colour, drawn and pooled, and none of that was mine. It was viscosity finding a topography that was already there.
Several shades of red went down. One red came up. I watched it happen — one field, moving, and the ridges catching the light and throwing it back at a different angle every hour. It dances with the light. That is not a figure of speech. Stand in front of it at nine in the morning and at four in the afternoon and it is not the same painting.
I did not photograph it before I started. The rule here is that you always do, because a painting made over another destroys the first as a visible thing and the photograph is the only reason it ever existed twice.
But I want to be accurate about what was lost. I had already destroyed this canvas once, in 2024, when I took the colour out of it. Whatever it was first, I did that. A photograph would have recorded the second state, not the first, and the first is gone in a way no rule of mine can reach.
Three paintings, stacked. One I cannot describe. One I made disappear on purpose. One you can see.
Sindoor is the vermilion of the parted hair and the smeared doorframe. Not decoration — the mark that says a threshold has been crossed. It goes on a bride, on a lintel, on the stone at the entrance to somewhere that matters. I grew up in a house where that was not a symbol. It was what you did before you went in.
I thought about Kumkum, which sits closer to the actual pigment; this red runs cooler and more crimson than the orange-vermilion of real sindoor. I chose the less accurate word, because threshold is the truer thing.
Three paintings. Two thresholds. One you can see.
